Hustler Magazine walking the tight rope

Hustler Magazine walking the tight rope of the First Amendment by publishing nude photos of a slain model @ @ABAJournal

Advertisements class action alleges fake prof class action alleges fake profiles, I guess its kind of like having a relationship with Barbie… @legalzoom class action alleges fake prof class action alleges fake profiles, I guess its kind of like having a relationship with Barbie… @legalzoom class action alleges fake prof class action alleges fake profiles, I guess its kind of like having a relationship with Barbie… @legalzoom

“Taco Hell” suit claims “beef” is on

“Taco Hell” suit claims “beef” is only 35% beef…TB adamantly disputes claim, do you think it’s legitimate? @legalzoom

CA’s “Do Not Track Bill” seems good i

CA’s “Do Not Track Bill” seems good in theory, yet detrimental in practice. Are current settings enough? @legalzoom

Facebook Search: Delivering a True Personalized Search


Hats off to John Battelle on this SearchBlog post.  The possibilities of a Facebook Search seem extremely feasible and valuable to Facebook albeit detrimental to Google.  A Facebook personalized search in the backdrop of Bing would deliver a heavy blow to Google’s command on the search industry.  It will be interesting to see if the integration of Google+ into Google searches will act as a catalyst, influencing Facebook’s decision to enter the search market and further compete toe-to-toe with Google.  For now all you can do is ponder the possibility with this great overview provided in Mr. Battelle’s post:

Dialing in from the department of Pure Speculation…

As we all attempt to digest the implications of last week’s Google+ integration, I’ve also be thinking about Facebook’s next moves. There’s been plenty of speculation in the past that Facebook might compete with Google directly – by creating a full web search engine. After all, with the Open Graph and in particular, all those Like buttons, Facebook is getting a pretty good proxy of pages across the web, and indexing those pages in some way might prove pretty useful.

But I don’t think Facebook will create a search engine, at least not in the way we think about search today. For “traditional” web search, Facebook can lean on its partner Microsoft, which has a very good product in Bing. I find it more interesting to think about what “search problem” Facebook might solve in the future that Google simply can’t.

And that problem could be the very same problem (or opportunity) that Google can’t currently solve for, the very same problem that drove Google to integrate Google+ into its main search index: that of personalized search.

As I wrote over the past week, I believe the dominant search paradigm – that of crawling a free and open web, then displaying the best results for any particular query – has been broken by the rise of Facebook on the one hand, and the app economy on the other. Both of these developments are driven by personalization – the rise of “social.”

Both Facebook and the app economy are invisible to Google’s crawlers. To be fair, there are billions of Facebook pages in Google’s index, but it’s near impossible to “organize them and make them universally available” without Facebook’s secret sauce (its social graph and related logged in data). This is what those 2009 negotiations broke down over, after all.

The app economy, on the other hand, is just plain invisible to anyone. Sure, you can go to one of ten or so app stores and search for apps to use, but you sure can’t search apps the way you search, say, a web site. Why? First, the use case of apps, for the most part, is entirely personal, so apps have not been built to be “searchable.” I find this extremely frustrating, because why wouldn’t I want to “Google” the hundreds of rides and runs I’ve logged on my GPS app, as one example?

Secondly, the app economy is invisible to Google because data use policies of the dominant app universe – Apple – make it nearly impossible to create a navigable link economy between apps, so developers simply don’t do it. And as we all know, without a navigable link economy, “traditional” search breaks down.

Now, this link economy may well be rebuilt in a way that can be crawled, through up and coming standards like HTML5 and Telehash. But it’s going to take a lot of time for the app world to migrate to these standards, and I don’t know that open standards like these will necessarily win. Not when there’s a platform that already exists that can tie them together.

What platform is that, you might ask? Why, Facebook, of course.

Stick with me here. Imagine a world where the majority of app builders integrate with Facebook’s Open Graph, instrumenting your personal data through Facebook such that your data becomes searchable. (If you think that’s crazy, remember how most major companies and app services have already fallen all over themselves to leverage Open Graph). Then, all that data is hoovered into Facebook’s “search index”, and integrated with your personal social graph. Facebook then builds an interface to all you app data, add in your Facebook social graph data, and then perhaps tosses in a side of Bing so you can have the whole web as a backdrop, should you care to.

Voila – you’ve got yourself a truly personalized new kind of search engine. A Facebook search engine, one that searches your world, apps, Facebook and all.

Strangers things will probably happen. What do you think?


This was originally published by John Battelle on January 16, 2012